Estate of Maguire v. McNutt
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fontron, J.:
After our decision was handed down reversing the judgment of the district court, the appellees filed a motion for rehearing. This court granted the appellees’ motion on April 12, 1970, but limited the rehearing to the following issue:
“Must a testamentary option granted two or more optionees be exercised jointly by all optionees?”
In all other respects the motion for rehearing was denied. Our action in granting a limited rehearing was influenced by the fact that, as pointed out in the appellees’ motion, the precise question had not been…
2Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Estate of NiehenkeWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- First of Denver Mortgage Investors v. C. N. Zundel & AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- Butts v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996
- Continental Cablevision of New England, Inc. v. United Broadcasting Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- McDonald v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.