Spiridon Spireas v. Commissioner of Internal Reven
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal requires us to decide whether royalties paid on a technology license agreement should have been treated as ordinary income or as capital gains. The distinction is significant for taxpayers like the Appellant, Dr. Spiridon Spireas, who earned $40 million in such royalties over just two tax years. If those earnings were ordinary income, Spireas owed a 35 percent tax; if they were capital gains he owed 15 percent.
Spireas claimed the favorable capital gains treatment pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 1235 (a), which applies to money received "in consideration of" "[a]…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jane Doe v. Mercy Catholic Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Huber v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Jeffrey R. Sewall and Ronald G. Walters v. Ronald G. WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- United States v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Altice USA Inc v. New Jersey Board of Public UtyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- HIRA Educational Services Nort v. Frank AugustineCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Junior AbreuCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Justin BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Anthony Meggs & Beth Meggs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.