Legal Opinion

Spiridon Spireas v. Commissioner of Internal Reven

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 26, 2018No. 17-1084PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal requires us to decide whether royalties paid on a technology license agreement should have been treated as ordinary income or as capital gains. The distinction is significant for taxpayers like the Appellant, Dr. Spiridon Spireas, who earned $40 million in such royalties over just two tax years. If those earnings were ordinary income, Spireas owed a 35 percent tax; if they were capital gains he owed 15 percent.

Spireas claimed the favorable capital gains treatment pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 1235 (a), which applies to money received "in consideration of" "[a]…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Jane Doe v. Mercy Catholic Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  3. Huber v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  4. Jeffrey R. Sewall and Ronald G. Walters v. Ronald G. WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Altice USA Inc v. New Jersey Board of Public UtyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
  2. HIRA Educational Services Nort v. Frank AugustineCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  3. United States v. Junior AbreuCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
  4. United States v. Justin BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
  5. Anthony Meggs & Beth Meggs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API