Legal Opinion
Shulzmer Watch & Jewelry Co. v. Cortat
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided February 7, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 8578PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.
We have reached these conclusions: The Municipal Court for the Los Angeles Judicial District was a proper court for the trial of this action, in which recovery of over $1,000 was sought, and as a consequence it was error to transfer the case from that court to the Oceanside Judicial District.
It is unfortunate, but a fact, that the Legislature at several places in the title of the Code of Civil Procedure dealing with the place of trial of civil actions (tit. IV, pt. 2) has used the definite article “the” where the indefinite article “a” should have been used. Beyond all doubt, in many…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Turner v. SimpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
- Art Frost of Glendale v. HooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Brown v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970