Legal Opinion

Surerus v. Matuska

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1996No. Civ. 950423Published

1Opinion of the Court

548 N.W.2d 384 (1996)

Tammy SURERUS, f/k/a Tammy Flaten, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Mark Thomas MATUSKA, Defendant and Appellant.

Civ. No. 950423.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

May 29, 1996.

Daniel E. Bertsch, Assistant State's Attorney, Fargo, for Plaintiff and Appellee.

Mark Thomas Matuska, Fargo, pro se.

NEUMANN, Justice.

Mark Thomas Matuska appeals an order amending his child support obligation. We hold that an imprisoned obligor who has no other income on which to compute a child support obligation may be unemployed or underemployed for the purpose of imputing income under the child support…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rueckert v. RueckertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hoster v. HosterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Spilovoy v. SpilovoyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Koch v. WilliamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Nelson v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API