Goldsmith v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1DissentBell, Judge
Distinguishing between pretrial discovery of privileged records and at trial disclosure of such records, ostensibly recognizing the latter as protected by the defendant’s constitutional right to present a defense, see Majority Op. at 130, the majority holds that “no common law, court rule, statutory or constitutional requirement [provides] that a defendant be permitted pre-trial discovery of privileged records held by a third party.” Majority Op. at 127. This holding impermissibly resolves an issue not decided by the courts below or presented by our grant of certiorari, Clark v. State, 306…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Giles v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.