Legal Opinion · Dissent

Goldsmith v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 12, 1995No. 146Published

1DissentBell, Judge

Distinguishing between pretrial discovery of privileged records and at trial disclosure of such records, ostensibly recognizing the latter as protected by the defendant’s constitutional right to present a defense, see Majority Op. at 130, the majority holds that “no common law, court rule, statutory or constitutional requirement [provides] that a defendant be permitted pre-trial discovery of privileged records held by a third party.” Majority Op. at 127. This holding impermissibly resolves an issue not decided by the courts below or presented by our grant of certiorari, Clark v. State, 306…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Giles v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API