Legal Opinion

Dalton v. City of Tulsa

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 8, 1977No. 48301PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice:

On behalf of himself, and all others like and similarly situated, appellant, Andrew T. Dalton, brought an action against the City *956of Tulsa, alleging that the' City, who sold water to its residents, violated provisions of the Uniform Consumer Credit Code, as enacted in Oklahoma,1 as the City did not properly disclose a 5% “penalty,” which was added to customer’s water bills, when not paid on time.

Appellant also alleged that patron’s constitutional right to procedural due process was violated by the City because proper notice and an opportunity to respond is not provided prior…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dablemont v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  2. City of Shawnee v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Way v. Grand Lake Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  2. Stephens v. Household Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  3. Bunch v. TERPENNINGCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009
  4. Frazier v. Public Service Company of OklahomaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2025
  5. Holt v. West Virginia-American Water Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API