Legal Opinion

In Re Mortgage Securities Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 11, 1935No. 283PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

75 F.2d 261 (1935)

In re MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORPORATION.

UNION TRUST CO. OF MARYLAND

v.

COMPTON et al.

No. 283.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

February 11, 1935.

Wickes & Neilson, of New York City (Robert H. Neilson and Nathan F. George, both of New York City, of counsel), for Manhattan Bank.

Niles, Barton, Morrow & Yost, of Baltimore, Md., and Kaye, Scholer, Fierman & Hays, of New York City (Carlyle Barton and George S. Yost, both of Baltimore, Md., and Jacob Scholer, of New York City, of counsel), for Union Trust Co.

Hays, Wolf, Kaufman & Schwabacher, of New York City, and Emory,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Union Trust Co. of Maryland v. ComptonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fidelity Assurance Assn. v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. In Re Nine North Church Street, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  3. Clarke v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  4. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. President & Directors of Manhattan Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  5. Brooklyn Trust Co. v. KelbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API