Legal Opinion

Monteith v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 17, 2020No. 4:18-cv-04481Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CINDY LAURAL MONTEITH, 7 Case No. 18-cv-04481-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR 9 SUMMARY JUDGMENT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 10 SECURITY, Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 24 11 Defendant. 12 Plaintiff Cindy Monteith moves for summary judgment to reverse the Commissioner of the 13 Social Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner’s”) final administrative decision, which found 14 Monteith not disabled and therefore denied her application for benefits under Title II of the Social 15 Security Act,

42 U.S.C. § 401

et seq. [Docket…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Robbins v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API