Legal Opinion
Balaban-Gordon Co. v. Brighton Sewer District No. 2
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 9, 1971PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames H. Boomer, J.
Plaintiff, a construction contractor, brings this action to rescind a bid submitted by it to the defendant sewer district, and for the return of its bid bond, because of an alleged mistake in the bid. The action was tried before me without a jury and this is my decision under CPLR 4213.
The facts proven are as follows:
The sewer district advertised for bids for the construction of improvements to two existing sewage treatment plants in the district. The construction work for each plant was divided into four separate sections: general construction, plumbing and equipment, electrical, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- M. F. Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Abner M. Harper, Inc. v. City of NewburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Colella v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- State Board of Control v. Clutter Construction CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- W. F. Martens & Co. v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Atlantic Audio-Visual Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Arlington Park Racetrack Ltd. v. SRM Computers, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- De Paola v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Triple a Contractors, Inc. v. Rural Water District No. 4Supreme Court of Kansas · 1979