Legal Opinion
Beyard v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 6, 2025No. 1:21-cv-01063Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Denise Beyard, et al., No. 1:21-cv-01063-KJM-SAB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 v. 14 Pentagon Federal Credit Union, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 Pentagon Federal Credit Union, the defendant in this proposed class action, moves to 18 | dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and improper venue. The court denies the motion 19 | in both respects. As explained in this order, there is a live case or controversy, a substantial part 20 | of the disputed transactions occurred within this District, and a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Decker Coal Company v. Commonwealth Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Gulf Insurance Company v. David Glasbrenner and Susan Glasbrenner, the Caldor Corporation F/k/a Caldor, Inc., Docket No. 04-0070-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.