Legal Opinion
Reznick v. Zurich North America Specialties
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 20, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendants are obligated to defend and indemnify the plaintiffs in an underlying legal malpractice action entitled Sapir v Reznick, pending in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, under index No. 1324/04, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated December 19, 2006, which denied their motion for summary judgment declaring that they are not obligated to so defend or indemnify the plaintiffs.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Great Canal Realty Corp. v. Seneca InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Deso v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Steinberg v. Hermitage InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Genova v. Regal Marine Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Di Giacomo v. Michael S. Langella, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Scordio Construction, Inc. v. Sirius America InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Fbangione v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Lemke v. Zurich North AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 2009