Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Marston v. Newavom

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 30, 1993Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRoberts, Justice

I agree with the Court’s decision affirming the award of damages for defamation. I respectfully disagree with the Court’s application of 26 M.R.S.A. § 626. We stated in Knoppers v. Rumford Community Hospital, 531 A.2d 1276, 1280 (Me.1987), that the Legislature intended that section 626 apply to “working people who are dependent upon full and regular wage payments to meet their weekly needs.” That limitation would exclude salaried corporate executives. See Black’s Law Dictionary 1200 (5th ed. 1979). Whether dicta or not, our statement in Knoppers should control the application of section 626…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Knoppers v. Rumford Community HospitalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API