Legal Opinion

Peasley v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided April 7, 1983No. Claim No. 66889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harold E. Koreman, J.

The defendant moves for dismissal of the .claim on the grounds that it fails to state a cause of action and that the defenses of payment and res judicata are a complete bar to the claim herein. The claimant cross-moves for summary judgment contending that he is entitled to the relief demanded in the claim as a matter of law.

The undisputed facts giving rise to the instant claim are as follows:

The State of New York, pursuant to the provisions of ECL 3-0305, appropriated certain lands owned by the claimant located in the Town of Lake Pleasant, Hamilton…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reilly v. ReidNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Wolcott v. BroughtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Peasley v. ReidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peasley v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API