Farkas v. Fulton, Supt. of Banks

OPINION

By OVERMYER, J.

Counsel for both parties state that the precise question here presented has not been before the courts of this state, but we find that the general proposition that no action may be maintained against the state itself, or officers of the state, by reason of negligent acts committed by their employes in connection with the state government or the- performance of their official duties, is sustained by an abundance of authorities.

The question whether the Superintendent of Banks is an officer and agent of the State has already been answered in the “affirmative by the Court of…