Legal Opinion
Hilltop Bowl, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided October 20, 1966No. Civ. A. Nos. 10340, 10341PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEN C. DAWKINS, Jr., Chief Judge.
RULING ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
After timely removal from the state court, we sustained a motion by defendants for entry of judgment. Hilltop Bowl, Inc. v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 248 F.Supp. 572 (W.D.La.1966). We concluded there that the bowling lanes installed by the lessee remained its property and were thus covered by the lessee’s insurance policy on the “contents” rather than the lessor’s policy on the “building.” Since the lessee’s policy was subject to a co-insurance clause,1 lessee was required to co-insure 28.986 per cent of the damage to the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Finn v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATIONLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Reliance Insurance Company v. Orleans Parish School Board, Orleans Parish School Board v. Reliance Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Youree v. LimerickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Rube v. Pacific Insurance Company of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- MacAluso v. WatsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Technical Land, Inc. v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Barham v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014