Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Charneco v. Gayda

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 14, 2011No. 4D11-2606Published

1ConcurrenceGross, J.

Although I find the trial judge’s order to be a departure from the essential requirements of law, I see no reason why the harm that will result from the order cannot be corrected on plenary appeal. The order fails to meet the requirements for certiorari review of an order denying discovery. See Romanos v. Caldwell, 980 So.2d 1091, 1092 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). (observing that certiorari review of orders denying discovery “is reserved for extraordinary and highly unusual situations where the trial court’s order constitutes a serious departure from the essential requirements of law that cannot be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Romanos v. CaldwellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API