Legal Opinion

Ishikawa v. Acheson

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided August 12, 1949No. Civ. 847PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLaughlin, judge.

This is a proceeding under § 903 of Title 8 United States Code Annotated, for a declaratory judgment as to the plaintiff’s citizenship.

Laying aside the color of the case, which portrays the plaintiff to have stood upon his rights as either a citizen of the United States or a subject , of Japan alternatively as best suited his personal purpose, pleasure, comfort, and convenience, the salient facts are as follows:

The plaintiff by virtue of being born in Honolulu, Territory of Hawaii, on July 11, 1916, to alien parents acquired at birth and since has retained the dual status of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dos Reis Ex Rel. Camara v. NicollsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947
  2. Doreau v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  3. In Re GogalDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Yuichi Inouye v. ClarkDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lehmann v. AchesonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  2. Shigenori Morizumi v. AchesonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1951
  3. Toshio Kondo v. AchesonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1951
  4. Serizawa v. DullesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
  5. Namba v. DullesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API