Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Jones

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1862PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

Suit by Reynolds, the holder, against Jones, the indorser, of a promissory note. Judgment for the defendant.

The question involved in this case is: Whether, in an action by the indorsee against the indorser of a promissory note, not governed by the law merchant, where there has been no suit against the maker, it is sufficient, in order to entitle the plaintiff to recover, to show that the maker was totally insolvent, at the earliest period of time when judgment could have been recovered against him; or whether it is necessary that he should have been thus insolvent at the time the note matured?

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Herald v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
  2. Dugdale v. MarineIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roberts v. MastersIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Markel v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Schmied v. FrankIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. First National Bank v. StapfIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Willson v. BinfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API