Prince v. Ogdensburg Transit Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
In Equity. In the matter of intervening petition claiming a maritime lien for supplies. On exceptions to master’s report. Goulder, Holding & Masten, for petitioners, Loftus Cuddy and Mar-' tin Mullen.
1Opinion of the Court
COLT, Circuit Judge.
This case was beard on exceptions to the master's report. The order of reference directed the master to ascertain and report his findings of fact and conclusions of law. Iso exceptions were taken to the findings of fact, which are substantially as follows: The petitioners, Loftus Cuddy and Martin Mullen, both of Cleveland, Ohio, are co-partners doing business at Cleveland under the name and style of the Cuddy-Mullen Coal Company. They have also a place of business at Handwich, in the province of Ontario, Canada. During the season of navigation of 1898, and prior to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Peyroux and Others v. HOWARD AND VARION.Supreme Court of the United States · 1833
- The St. Jago De Cuba. Vinente, and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- The ValenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- The IrisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900
- McRae v. Bowers Dredging Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1898
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- The James T. FurberDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1904
- The Cora P. WhiteDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1917
- The AlligatorDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1907
- The J. R. LangdonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1906
- The Reed Bros. Dredge No. 1District Court, S.D. New York · 1905