Lloyd Corporation v. Whiffen
Oregon Supreme Court
1DissentCarson, J.
I. MAJORITY’S ANALYSIS
A. INTRODUCTION
Shorn of its obfuscating fleece, the majority opinion holds that trespassers may not be enjoined from further trespassing so long as the trespassers are gathering signatures for an initiative petition. Because I believe that this case should be analyzed differently and resolved in plaintiffs favor, I dissent.
*690B. THE MAJORITY’S ANALYSIS IS NOT SUBCONSTITUTIONAL
After stating the facts amidst occasional hypothesizing, the majority is emphatic in stating the well-recognized principle that a court should avoid constitutional adjudication when it may decide a…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lloyd Corp. v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Hall v. May Department Stores Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Cologne v. Westfarms AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.