Lamons v. Good Foods Inc.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Justice.
Both the petition and the evidence show that the contract between the parties to this suit was in parol, and was for a period of five years. Such a contract is clearly defined by the Code, § 61-102. While it is there provided that a contract creating the relationship of landlord and tenant, if in parol, is valid for one year, it is further declared that if for more than one year it “shall have the effect of a tenancy at will.” The contract of the parties to this action stands upon the same footing as a tenancy at will, and the rights of the parties under that contract are…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Neely v. SheppardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Graham v. TheisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
- Marshall v. HicksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wells v. H. W. Lay Company Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Smith v. Top Dollar Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Norris v. Downtown LaGrange Development AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Smith v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Byrom v. RingeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.