Legal Opinion

Estate of Trompeter v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided July 22, 1998No. Tax Ct. Dkt. No. 11170-95Published

ESTATE OF EMANUEL TROMPETER, DECEASED, ROBIN CAROL TROMPETER GONZALEZ AND JANET ILENE TROMPETER POLACHEK, CO-EXECUTORS, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent *This opinion supplements our Memorandum Opinion in Estate of Trompeter v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1998-35. E, an estate, is subject to the fraud penalty of sec. 6663(a), I.R.C.

Read the full summary

ESTATE OF EMANUEL TROMPETER, DECEASED, ROBIN CAROL TROMPETER GONZALEZ AND JANET ILENE TROMPETER POLACHEK, CO-EXECUTORS, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent *This opinion supplements our Memorandum Opinion in Estate of Trompeter v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1998-35. E, an estate, is subject to the fraud penalty of sec. 6663(a), I.R.C. R computes this penalty based on E's underpayment as determined by taking into account only the deductions which were included on E's Federal estate tax return. E computes its underpayment by also taking into account deductions for expenses,…

1Opinion of the Court

ESTATE OF EMANUEL TROMPETER, DECEASED, ROBIN CAROL TROMPETER GONZALEZ AND JANET ILENE TROMPETER POLACHEK, CO-EXECUTORS, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Estate of Trompeter v. Commissioner

Tax Ct. Dkt. No. 11170-95

United States Tax Court

111 T.C. 57; 1998 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 38; 111 T.C. No. 2;

July 22, 1998, Filed

ESTATE OF EMANUEL TROMPETER, DECEASED, ROBIN CAROL TROMPETER GONZALEZ AND JANET ILENE TROMPETER POLACHEK, CO-EXECUTORS, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent *

E, an estate, is subject to the fraud penalty of sec. 6663(a), I.R.C. R computes…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Chabot; Concurrence · Swift; Concurrence · Halpern; Dissent.

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Badaracco v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. D. Ginsberg & Sons, Inc. v. PopkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. United States v. Olympic Radio & Television, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Manning v. Seeley Tube & Box Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API