Dantel Corporation v. Whidby
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Judge.
1. The record in the present case does not disclose whether the lien filed by Whidby (although it is undis puted that a lien was filed), was filed under the provisions of Code § 67-1801 or under the provisions of Code § 67-2001 as amended. No demurrers were filed and after verdict, since the evidence must be construed most strongly in favor of the verdict, if the defendant was entitled to a verdict under either provision of the Code the verdict cannot be said to be without evidence to support it.
Under Code § 67-1801 laborers may file a lien on the property of their employers,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Oliver v. Macon Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Tuck v. Moss Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Eagle & Phenix Mills v. HerronSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Long v. GilbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Cox v. Cody & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1886
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Finley v. Franklin Aluminum Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Almand Construction Co. v. GuyeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971