Legal Opinion

Dantel Corporation v. Whidby

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 5, 1958No. 37221PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge.

1. The record in the present case does not disclose whether the lien filed by Whidby (although it is undis puted that a lien was filed), was filed under the provisions of Code § 67-1801 or under the provisions of Code § 67-2001 as amended. No demurrers were filed and after verdict, since the evidence must be construed most strongly in favor of the verdict, if the defendant was entitled to a verdict under either provision of the Code the verdict cannot be said to be without evidence to support it.

Under Code § 67-1801 laborers may file a lien on the property of their employers,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Oliver v. Macon Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  2. Tuck v. Moss Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Eagle & Phenix Mills v. HerronSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Long v. GilbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  5. Cox v. Cody & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1886

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Finley v. Franklin Aluminum Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Almand Construction Co. v. GuyeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API