Legal Opinion

Grossman v. Lerud

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2014No. 20140182PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Dustin Lerud appealed from the April 4, 2014, second amended judgment of the district court modifying his child support obligation. We affirm, concluding that the district court correctly imputed Lerud’s income under the North Dakota child support guidelines using a North Dakota statewide average.

I

[¶ 2] Dustin Lerud and Megan Gross-man have a minor child together. As part of the original judgment, Lerud was required to pay child support based on imputation of his income at the minimum wage. Grossman requested a review of Lerud’s child support obligation. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Richter v. HouserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State Ex Rel. K.B. v. BauerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Western Gas Resources, Inc. v. HeitkampNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Serr v. SerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Gadeco, LLC v. Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schrodt v. SchrodtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Gooss v. GoossNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Boldt v. BoldtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Edison v. EdisonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Eubanks v. FisketjonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API