In Re Holt
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.
The applicant appellant’s first assignment of error contends that the trial judge erred in finding and concluding that the General County Court of Alamance County has jurisdiction to try divorce actions.
Jurisdiction to try and determine divorce actions was conferred upon the General County Court of Alamance County by statute. G.S. 7-279; McLean v. McLean, 233 N.C. 139, 63 S.E. 2d 138. And by the express provisions of G.S. 50-13.5 (h), effective from and after October 1, 1967, the General County Court of Alamance County retains such jurisdiction until a district court is established in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re the Custody of SaulsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- McLean v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- In Re BlakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Blankenship v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Wilson v. Commissioners of Bladen CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
3Cited by10 opinions
- Oxendine v. Catawba County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Wilson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Kennedy v. SurrattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Shook v. PeavyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.