Legal Opinion

Murray v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 13, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*503Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered May 2, 2007, which granted defendants’ motion to amend their answer to include the affirmative defense of collateral estoppel, and granted their motion to dismiss the complaint on that ground, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting defendants’ motion for leave to amend their answer to include the affirmative defense of collateral estoppel. “Leave to amend the pleadings shall be freely given absent prejudice or surprise resulting directly from the delay” (Fahey v…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barbour v. Hospital for Special SurgeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Antwerpse Diamantbank N.V. v. NisselAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dagvadorj v. DeFleurAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Banco Popular North America v. LiebermanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2008
  3. Charles v. SuvannavejhNew York Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Nussberg v. TatintsianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Quire v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API