Legal Opinion
Chikara v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 28, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLouis L. Friedman, J.
Plaintiffs moved ‘ ‘ for an order ratifying a notice of claim upon the defendants.” Upon the argument, it developed that the interest of the infant required that the court also have before it a motion to amend the notice of claim. Such a notice was served and the latter motion- will be first discussed.
This motion ‘1 for an order correcting a notice of claim upon the defendants or for leave nunc pro tune to serve notice of claim upon the defendants,” once again points up the injustice of some of the restrictions contained in section 50-e of the General Municipal Law.
The action is brought by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Teresta v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Martin v. School Board of Union Free District No. 28New York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Brown v. Board of TrusteesNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Biancoviso v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Munroe v. BoothNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chikara v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Naujokas v. CareyNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- Favier v. WinickNew York Supreme Court · 1992