State v. Robinson
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
Bertha Mae Robinson appeals her conviction for the murder of her husband. We affirm.
Appellant contends first that the trial judge erred by failing to charge the jury that if it found her guilty, but could not decide between murder and manslaughter, it must resolve the doubt in her favor. The law to be charged must be determined from the evidence presented. State v. Somerset, S. C., 277 S. E. (2d) 593; State v. Rogers, S. C., 272 S. E. (2d) 792 (1980). We agree that appellant’s proposition of law would not be incorrect under the proper circumstances but here there was no…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. NorrisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
- State v. SinclairSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
- State v. MattisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- State v. SomersetSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. WhippleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- State v. DuffSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- State v. DuffSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- State v. WhippleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996