Legal Opinion
National Automatic Device Co. v. Lloyd
U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois
Decided September 23, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In Equity. On motion for injunction pendente Me.
1Opinion of the CourtBlodgett, J.
Complainant moves for an injunction pendente lite in this case. The bill charges the infringement of patent No. 410,981, granted to Fred. N. Lang, on- the 10th day of September, 1889, for a ‘■Toy Automatic Race-Course,” and contains the usual prayer for an injunction and accounting. The device covered by the patent is a shaft projecting upwards from the center of the base of a circular shell or case, from 15 to 18 inches in diameter, to which shaft a clock-vork mechanism is so geared that it can be made to revolve rapidly by releasing the escapement of the clock-work. On this shaft are…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bedford v. HuntU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1817
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fuller v. BergerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
- Juicy Whip, Inc. v. Orange Bang, Inc. And Unique Beverage Dispensers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Tolfree v. WetzlerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1927
- Reliance Novelty Co. v. DworzekU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1897
- Egbert v. GreenbergU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1900