People v. Echevarria
New York Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Chief Judge Lippman (dissenting in part).
I respectfully dissent in Johnson because I believe that the majority’s holding eviscerates the substance of Presley v Georgia (558 US 209 [2010]) in New York State criminal trials, and allows such issues to escape meaningful appellate review.
The right of a criminal defendant to a public trial is fundamental (People v Martin, 16 NY3d 607, 611 [2011]; US Const 6th, 14th Amends; see also Civil Rights Law § 12; Judiciary Law § 4). And, although it “may give way in certain cases to other rights or interests,” “[s]uch circumstances will be rare . . . and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Presley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- People v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- People v. KanNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.