Legal Opinion

Cammon v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided May 10, 1984No. 13-82-232-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

This is a capital murder case. Appellant, a sixteen year old, was tried by a jury and found guilty of the murder of Natalie He-rold. Prior to trial, appellant was certified as an adult and, upon being found guilty of capital murder, was given the mandatory sentence of life imprisonment.

Appellant asserts as his first ground of error on appeal that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence appellant’s written statement because it was not given knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily but was the product of coercion. The statement of which appellant complains is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Paulus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Romo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Garza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Rumbaugh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  2. Prater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Moreno v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
  4. Spears v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API