Carnegie Mellon University v. Marvell Technology Group, Ltd.

ORDER

Carnegie Mellon’s petition for rehearing en banc is denied in part and held in abeyance in part. The court will hold in abeyance any decision on the request for rehearing en banc with respect to the first issue raised in Carnegie Mellon’s petition, which seeks review of the panel’s ruling on the enhancement of damages issue. The court will hold Carnegie Mellon’s petition as to that issue pending the Supreme Court’s decision in Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., 769 F.3d 1371 (Fed.Cir.2014) cert. granted, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 356, 193 L.Ed.3d 289 (2015) and Stryker Corp. v.…