Legal Opinion

Mayor, Lane & Co. v. Charles I. Weinstein Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided October 15, 1914Published

Motion for a new trial in an action to recover a sum of money.

1Opinion of the CourtFinelite, J.

Plaintiff and defendant are domestic corporations, each having a place for the transaction of business in the city of New York. Plaintiff brings this action to recover the sum of $500 from the defendant on a draft, alleging that on the 2d day of December, 1913, the plaintiff was a creditor of Katz & Kanter, Inc., and in consideration of the forbearance by plaintiff in enforcing the payment of said sum the Charles I. Weinstein Realty Company agreed to pay the sum of $500 to the plaintiff. On the trial hereof the plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed. A motion thereafter was made for a new trial,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schmittler v. . SimonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Romeyn v. SicklesNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Lienan v. LincolnThe Superior Court of New York City · 1853
  4. Sampson v. Grand Rapids School Furniture Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  5. Tate v. American Woolen Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API