Legal Opinion

Mendoza v. SSC & B Lintas, New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 5, 1996No. 92 Civ. 0709 (RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

The plaintiff Roberto Mendoza (“Mendoza”) in an action against his former employer, defendant SSC & B, New York (“Lintas”), alleged tortious interference with contract and discriminatory conduct arising out of a denial of promotion and his discharge as retaliation for complaints filed by Mendoza with the New York State Division of Human Rights (“SDHR”). The action was tried before a court and jury, and upon all the prior proceedings, the evidence submitted, and findings and conclusions set forth below, judgment will be entered dismissing the complaint.

Prior…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Pamela Kotcher and Barbara Davis, Pamela Kotcher v. Rosa and Sullivan Appliance Center, Inc., and Herbert TrageserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  3. Cynthia J. Fisher, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Vassar College, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. Mendoza v. SSC & B Lintas, New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Henny v. New York StateDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  2. Pesok v. HEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTEDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  3. Concha v. Purchase College State University of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API