Stephen Saccoccia v. Robert Farley
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COOK, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Stephen Saccoccia appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Our precedent requires a § 2241 petitioner to demonstrate, inter alia, “actual innocence” of his underlying offenses. Because we agree with the district court’s assessment that Saccoccia fails to do so, we affirm.
In 1993, a jury convicted Saccoccia of RICO conspiracy and related money-laundering offenses in connection with his laundering $136 million in drug-transaction proceeds. Saccoccia v. United States, 69 F.Supp.2d 297, 299 (D.R.I.1999).…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. SaccocciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Wooten v. CauleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- In re MazzioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Corbin v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
- Donna Grindstaff v. Wilson County, et al.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026
- MacKenzie 932343 v. MorrisonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024
- Redding 659495 v. HortonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2020
- Seals v. ChapmanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.