Legal Opinion

Fairchild Auto Co. v. Reed

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 1915No. 6402Published

Appeal from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Division “D,” No. 106,677. Honorable Porter Parker, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

His Honor, CHARLES F. CLAIBORNE,

rendered the opinion and decree of tne court, as follows:

Thus is a suit oh a promissory note,

x íaiiiuit claims that it is tne noider of a promissory note for $162.50, dated February 15th, 1912, payable at three months, with interest, drawn by defendant, who has refused to pay the same, and it prays for judgment accordingly.

Defendant admits his signature to the note but alleges that it was given without consideration under the following circumstances, viz:

That said note was given a.s part of the purchase price of an automobile which he purchased from plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Iberia Cypress Co. v. Von SchoelerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  2. Wilcox's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1886
  3. Hinkley v. BlethenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1886
  4. Beale's Heirs v. De GruySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1831
  5. Wharton v. BrickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API