Legal Opinion

Halpern v. Goldstein & Halpern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 20, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action pursuant to Partnership Law § 63, inter alia, for dissolution of two partnerships and an accounting, the defendants Goldstein & Halpern, C.P.A., Goldstein, Karlewicz & Goldstein, C.P.A., Martin Goldstein, Scott Goldstein, Donald Karlewicz, Elliot Boxer, and 501 Associates appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Friedman, J.H.O.), dated July 10, 2001, as granted that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was to strike their answer unless they provided an accounting by August 10, 2001.

Ordered that the order is affirmed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williams v. WayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 6D Farm Corp. v. CarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Allied Bingo Supplies of Florida, Inc. v. HynesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Halpern v. Goldstein & HalpernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API