Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Or. Bureau of Labor & Indus.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 22, 2018No. A158278PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, J.

*337In the final order challenged in this judicial review proceeding, the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) determined that respondent Johnson, owner and operator of Duck Stop Market (DSM), violated ORS 659A.142(4) and OAR 839-006-0300(2) (Feb. 24, 2010) when she refused to allow complainant, an individual with a disability, to enter DSM with a service dog. In seeking judicial review, Johnson makes three narrow arguments, each of which we reject for the reasons set out below. Accordingly, we affirm.

On April 17, 2013, complainant visited DSM, accompanied by her husband and two dogs,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Evans v. Multnomah County Sheriff's OfficeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Augustus v. Oregon State Board of NursingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fenimore v. Blachly-Lane Cnty. C.E.A.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API