Planned Parenthood of Greater Orlando, Inc., etc. v. MMB Properties, etc.
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtPariente, J.
The conflict issue presented in this case involves the standard for modifying or dissolving a temporary injunction. The Fifth District Court of Appeal “acknowledge^] conflict with the Third and Fourth Dis-trictfs]” as to whether a party moving to modify or dissolve a temporary injunction must establish “changed circumstances.” Planned Parenthood of Greater Orlando v. MMB Properties, 171 So.3d 125, 128 & n.3 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).1 We conclude that requiring a party to meet the burden of proving changed circumstances even when a party shows clear misapprehension of the facts or clear legal error…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. BarberSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- State v. T.G.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
- NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADV. CO. v. JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Orlando Orange Groves Co. v. HaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Sullivan v. MorenoSupreme Court of Florida · 1882
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State of Florida, Department of Health v. Bayfront HMA Medical Center, LLC etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Miranda v. Pacheco Entertainment Production Enterprises, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Edgar Andraus v. RP I-Drive, LLC, Etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
- GFA INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. ERIC TRILLASDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
- Harlow v. Tier 1 Pest Solutions, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.