Legal Opinion

Planned Parenthood of Greater Orlando, Inc., etc. v. MMB Properties, etc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 23, 2017No. SC15-1655PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPariente, J.

The conflict issue presented in this case involves the standard for modifying or dissolving a temporary injunction. The Fifth District Court of Appeal “acknowledge^] conflict with the Third and Fourth Dis-trictfs]” as to whether a party moving to modify or dissolve a temporary injunction must establish “changed circumstances.” Planned Parenthood of Greater Orlando v. MMB Properties, 171 So.3d 125, 128 & n.3 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).1 We conclude that requiring a party to meet the burden of proving changed circumstances even when a party shows clear misapprehension of the facts or clear legal error…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. BarberSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  2. State v. T.G.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
  3. NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADV. CO. v. JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  4. Orlando Orange Groves Co. v. HaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  5. Sullivan v. MorenoSupreme Court of Florida · 1882

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State of Florida, Department of Health v. Bayfront HMA Medical Center, LLC etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. Miranda v. Pacheco Entertainment Production Enterprises, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. Edgar Andraus v. RP I-Drive, LLC, Etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
  4. GFA INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. ERIC TRILLASDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
  5. Harlow v. Tier 1 Pest Solutions, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API