Legal Opinion

Engel v. United States

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1978No. Civ. A. 75-51 Erie, 75-67 EriePublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WEBER, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs in both of the above-captioned cases brought in this court successful suits for tax refunds and now claim to be entitled to attorney’s fees under the recent amendment to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (Supp.1977), which provides as follows:

“ . . . [I]n any civil action or proceeding, by or on behalf of the United States of America, to enforce, or charging a violation of, a provision of the United States Internal Revenue Code . the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorney’s fee as part of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Levno v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1977
  2. In Re KlineDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1977
  3. Lieb v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Key Buick Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Steven M. Kipperman and Stephanie Kipperman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API