State v. Southern
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
The only question before us is whether the Court of Appeals was correct in determining that the trial court erred at sentencing by concluding that certain convictions in which prayer for judgment was continued and no fines or other conditions imposed constituted “prior convictions” under the Fair Sentencing Act, particularly N.C.G.S. § 15A-1340.4(a)(l)(o) and -1340.2(4). Believing that the Court of Appeals was correct, we conclude that its decision should be
Affirmed.
2Cited by11 opinions
- State v. WimmerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. BenfieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. BartowCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.