Legal Opinion

Foos v. Terminix

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 25, 2003No. 89,239PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PlERRON, J.:

Terminix and Zurich American Insurance Company (Terminix) appeal the decision of the Workers Compensation Board (Board) that Dennis Foos was entitled to an award of benefits following a one-vehicle accident. Terminix argues the Board incorrectly found that a blood test showing Foos was intoxicated was inadmissible.

The parties, for the most part, do not dispute the facts. The issue is whether certain facts are admissible in the worker compensation proceedings.

Foos worked for Terminix as a pest control technician. Foos lived in Solomon and drove a Terminix truck to service…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Stephens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Kindel v. Ferco Rental, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  4. Angleton v. Starkan, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  5. Newman v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scott Ex Rel. Administrator v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. In Re the Equalization Proceeding of the Amoco Production Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
  3. Chowning v. Cannon Valley Woodwork, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API