Legal Opinion

MacLeay Estate Co. v. Curry County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

The plaintiff instituted this suit to quiet title to a tract of land. The only portion of the answer material to the controversy before us alleges the existence of three public roads upon the aforementioned tract of land; one of these roads is known as the Bagnell Ferry Road; a second is referred to as the Port Orford-Ellensburg Road, and the third is designated as the Witness Rock-Salthouse Road. The reply concedes the legal existence of the first, and denies the defendant’s allegations in regard to the second and the third. Upon the trial, the plaintiff admitted that the Port…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Curtis v. La Grande Hydraulic Water Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Chapman v. DeanOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Stotts v. DichdelOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Bitney v. GrimOregon Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. MacLeay Estate Co. v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Martin v. Klamath CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. MacLeay Estate Co. v. Gold Beach Packing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API