Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Van Wagner

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1947PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallinan, J.

Motion by plaintiff for summary judgment; cross motion by defendants for an order dismissing the complaint for legal insufficiency.

In February, 1940, plaintiff lent money to the defendants and received as security therefor a third mortgage. Thereafter plaintiff to protect her third mortgage acquired the second mortgage by assignment. Still later, plaintiff lent defendants $500 *534which was secured by a fourth mortgage. In 1943, plaintiff to protect her second, third and fourth mortgages purchased the first mortgage from a savings bank. This action is brought to foreclose all four mortgages.

Defend…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lerche v. . BrasherNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Bremer v. RingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. Redmond v. HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  4. Freund v. James McCullagh, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  5. First Trust & Deposit Co. v. Holt & Thomas, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lindner v. EichelNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Anderson v. AndersonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1961
  3. Welsh v. WoottonNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  4. La Nationale v. LavanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1956
  5. Schottenstein v. OrtnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API