Legal Opinion

Barco v. Doyle

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1905PublishedCited by 10 opinions

This case was decided 'by Division A. Appeal from, the Circuit Court for Citrus County.

1Opinion of the CourtCockrell, J.

The appellees, after several amendments filed an amended bill in February, 1904, in which they allege substantially as follows: that in April, 1882, W. C. Doyle, through whom they claim by devise or inheritance, now deceased, entered into a partnership with one A. S. Mann, for the purpose of buying, entering and selling lands and that Doyle put into said partnership five thousand dollars in cash, of which sum Mann should have contributed one half, but being unable to do so, he gave his note to Doyle for that amount, bearing six per cent, interest; that the five thousand dollars was invested…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hughes v. HannahSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
  2. Herrin v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
  3. Durham v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  4. Mattair v. PayneSupreme Court of Florida · 1876
  5. Durham v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Florida · 1904

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BeazleySupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  2. Godwin v. PhiferSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  3. Horne v. J. C. Turner Cypress Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1908
  4. Murrell v. PetersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  5. Chaves v. ChavesSupreme Court of Florida · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API