State ex rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate Bureau

VAUGHN, Judge.

The dissent in this case makes it reasonably certain that the final disposition of the appeal will be determined by the Supreme Court. We will not, therefore, attempt to recapitulate the evidence or set out a detailed statement of the reasoning that leads us to the conclusion that the order is so affected by errors of law that it must be vacated. The errors of law include the following:(1) The Commissioner’s conclusions that the data submitted had not been “audited” and that it, therefore, is not reliable cannot be sustained in the light of all of the evidence offered in…