Legal Opinion

Mullinax v. J.M. Brown Amusement Co.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 31, 1997No. 2649PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUFF, Judge:

Gladys Mullinax filed this action for the recovery of her husband’s gambling losses under S.C.Code Ann. § 32-1-20 (1991) in 1993. The trial judge directed a verdict for Respondents on the grounds that Appellant’s suit was collusive and barred by § 32-1-20. After a review of the legislative policy behind the statute and an examination of other jurisdictions’ interpretations of the statute, we reverse and remand. 1

FACTS

Mrs. Mullinax filed this action against Respondents to recover losses her “helplessly addicted” husband sustained from 1991 to 1998 while playing video poker on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Berkebile v. OutenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Unlimited Services, Inc. v. MacKlen Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Hughes v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  4. Green v. ThorntonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  5. Collins & Sons Fine Jewelry, Inc. v. SOUTHEASTERN SECURITY SYS., INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mullinax v. J.M. Brown Amusement Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. State v. ZulferCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Gallagher Ex Rel. Estate of Evert v. EvertCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Williamsburg Rural Water & Sewer Co. v. Williamsburg County Water & Sewer AuthorityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API