Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Copenhaver

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 29, 1986No. 81 608; CA A36105Published

1Per curiam

This dissolution case is before us again following our remand to consider the effect of Or Laws 1983, ch 766, on the financial circumstances of husband, who is a circuit court judge. 69 Or App 333, 687 P2d 1086 (1984). We are now satisfied that the value of husband’s retirement benefits was properly considered as part of the marital assets in the trial court’s making an approximately equal property division, as it should have done.

We consider only wife’s contention that spousal support should be permanent. The original decree awarded her $600 per month for 18 months; on remand, the court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Marriage of CopenhaverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API