In re the Marriage of Copenhaver
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
This dissolution case is before us again following our remand to consider the effect of Or Laws 1983, ch 766, on the financial circumstances of husband, who is a circuit court judge. 69 Or App 333, 687 P2d 1086 (1984). We are now satisfied that the value of husband’s retirement benefits was properly considered as part of the marital assets in the trial court’s making an approximately equal property division, as it should have done.
We consider only wife’s contention that spousal support should be permanent. The original decree awarded her $600 per month for 18 months; on remand, the court…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re the Marriage of CopenhaverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984