Legal Opinion
Centsable Products, Inc. v. Jerome H. Lemelson
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 23, 1979No. 78-1969PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.
In Count I of its amended complaint, the plaintiff Centsable Products, Inc. (Centsable) sued Jerome H. Lemelson and three licensees 1 under his U.S. patent No. 3,032,-345 seeking a decree that the patent is invalid and not infringed by the dart game sold by Centsable. Counts II through IV claimed injury from the defendants’ efforts to protect the assertedly valid patent; Count II asserted a pendent claim of unfair competition; Count III alleged a conspiracy under Section 1 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. § 1); and Count IV was brought under the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sakraida v. Ag Pro, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wyeth Laboratories v. ReyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Dann v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Research Corporation v. Nasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bergstrom v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1980
- George M. Mooney v. Brunswick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Dennis G. Moore, George R. Moore and Sierra Products, Inc., Plaintiffs- Cross-Appellees v. Wesbar Corporation and Bernard R. Weber, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- L. E. Sauer MacHine Company, Inc. v. Corrugated Finishing Products, Inc. And Shadeland Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Sylvan R. Shemitz v. Deere & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.