Legal Opinion
United States v. Mark Palmer Splawn
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 15, 1992No. 91-6251PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
In United States v. McNutt, 908 F.2d 561 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 955, 112 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1991), a panel of this court held that a cloned satellite television descrambling device, which enables satellite television viewers to receive premium channel broadcasts without paying the required subscription fees, falls within the criminal prohibition on surreptitious interception devices of 18 U.S.C. § 2512(1)(b). 908 F.2d at 564-65. Accord United States v. Davis, 978 F.2d 415, 419-20 (8th Cir.1992) (en banc); United States v. Lande, 968 F.2d 907,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Jackie Ray HillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Duane Dale DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- DIRECTV Inc. v. PepeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- DirecTV, Inc. v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Directv Incorporated v. Dennis NicholasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- DirecTV, Inc. v. HartDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2004
- Williams v. City & County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.